Glenellen Solar Farm

27/11/2023

Comment

Email

jim-parrett-submission-for-glenellen-solar-farm_redacted.pdf (PDF, 3.8 MB)

23/11/2023

Comment

Email

lynette-lablack-2-submission-for-glenellen-solar-farmredacted.pdf (PDF, 392.62 KB)

23/11/2023

Comment

Email

lynette-lablack-3-submission-for-glenellen-solar-farmredacted.pdf (PDF, 381.75 KB)

23/11/2023

Comment

Email

lynette-lablack-1-submission-for-glenellen-solar-farmredacted.pdf (PDF, 390.12 KB)

New South Wales

11/11/2023

Comment

Website

Overall I am supportive of the development of the solar farm at Glenellen. However, Trinia in moving the access route from Glenellen Rd to Lindner and Ortlipp Rd will now not only have to widen the road for Bdoubles, but also lop a significant number of mature trees that have overhanging branches as they will impede the flow of trucks. This roadside vegetation is home to a squirrel glider population. I therefore want Trinia to consider and implement measures that can offset this impact on glider movements across the road corridor.

New South Wales

23/11/2023

Object

Website

Glenellen Solar plan – marked by dots, red , above a Scared area called Jindera, Sacred. It is Sacred. How did you access here, please, Mr Government ? Who let you in here ? In this area are Sacred Lines you cannot touch. Important Ley Lines. Which Mob have you consulted with, Please. Which Mob ? Which Elder, please? If you understand Ley Lines then Cease and Desist the Toxic Future Renewables Now. Please. Please. I say you are offering a very Toxic Future to a region named Murray Darling Food Bowl, do you understand, no. Unfortunately you don’t understand, so therefore you are now Fully Responsible for Toxic Future NSW Victoria, yes, a Vital area of Food Production I don’t know if you have realized. Don’t know why you haven’t realized that. Don’t. Are you a Farmer On Country in the Murray Darling Basin Food Bowl region ? Well, are you ? In my Current age group, there are serious Issues on Catchments on the Driest Continent on Earth, called Australia, the Driest Continent On Earth. It is. What happens if there’s fires more than ever ? Well ? Give me a response and give it to me, a researcher of Human Impacts to Life on Earth, to Catchments in a Dry Continent, and to Farmland, that is now under Immense threat from Toxic Heavy Metals, correct, IF, NB , IF any more Solar Farms access Farmland , Hinterland to Farmland, Wetlands, Floodplains, etc, into subsurface inner Catchments that are Water Aquifers, that Water into Catchments far from into close to any Farmland. I understand Catchments. Our government does not. Does not. Does not. Toxic Nature is government, and it needs to Cease, Please. Yes. Cease. Cease and Desist Solar Farms On Country, On Farmland, On Wetlands, On Floodplains Immediately and Know Why, gov.au, and the Commissioners I feel have no awareness about Catchments in a Dry Continent, hm. My Dry Continent needs absolute Care for Country into Next Generations , 8 to be exact, 8, 8, 8 Generations, from current Age 18 years olds here now. 18 years old humans are needing to become Aware of what our government plans for Their future. A More Toxic one, yes, and Why ? Please say Why ? Alternatives exist re power and energy and also Less Is Best Future Please Please Please, Please, Humanity, upon a Planet , Losing it’s Original Nature Created Forms of All Nature. God please Cease and Desist our Australian Government, who are Not able to Care for Country , as a Dry Continent they are unaware of, and that is Correct, and it is, is is is, is. What about a Royal Commission into the Australian Government, I say , as a Carer to Country , and All On Country, fighting for the Rights of All On Country Australia, the Driest Continent on Earth, our government has NO knowledge of, and therefore places the Future, as us here now , as us here now, as us here now, into 8 Generations from now, under Threat from Toxic Future Renewables as a Not Need On a Dry Continent, correct, correct. Go away from my Nation, mine, I Love and amneeding Care offered To, for once, NB. If the Future Limits Farmland you must Be Responsible and Be Responsible. If you can Please offer Renewables to Rooftops of All Australians, Businesses, Industries, Carparks, All rooves in Australia, then you can easily power everything, yes, yes yes yes, and Leave Farmland upon the Murray Darling Basin alone, For Gods Sake. One day I hope all employees of our government are in prison for Harm and Loss To, and I mean it, because it takes a little while to understand a Dry Continent, this government is Completely Unaware of, sadly so. Solar Farms are a Heat Impact, and they are. What does Heat do, please? You don’t know or you would have Stopped Renewables a Long time ago. Renewables Impact Climate. I have observed it in my research on Impacts to Upper Tributary Catchments of the Darling Basin Food Bowl. Stop this Foolish Nonsense re Renewables On Country, please. They can go On Rooftops and Not need the Infrastructure you are Unable to pay for, eh, government. How Dare You. How Dare You. How Dare You, gov.au and IPC Commissionerswho are Unaware and Threaten a Dry Continent they have NO understanding of, you see. Cease and Desist Glenellen Solar, please. It’s on a Valuable area of Land and you should know that. You haven’t consulted Mob have you ? How Dare you. How Dare you. And How Dare You. These are Catchments to Murray River and they are. You horrible people with Little Respect to this beautiful old old old old Continent, once in the Hands of Such Care. Once. Not now. Get Out of My Nation, please government, and do so Immediately, and let us sit down and discuss OUR Future you have No interest in , because you want to poison Farmland , rivers, and Huge Rivers that are bordering NSW and Victoria. Subsurface Catchments you have Never considered you see. How Dare You all as government. Cease and Desist Glenellen Solar Farm and any Infrastructure associated with Renewables. Are you understanding what you threaten ? Wake Up please. A future cannot be Toxic, More,More Toxic. Don’t let it be More Toxic. In my understanding of how government works, I say they are Unable to offer Care for Country. I Demand a Royal Commission into Renewables, Transmission Lines, BESS, Hydrogen Harm and Loss To infrastructure , unnecessary upon Earth, under Threat from Money Talks Louder than Care for Country, hm. Why aren’t you Caring for Country ? Money, is it ? How Dare you, government. You need to be in an Investigation and I know why, and it’s because Emissions Increase as you Think a Net Zero. Net Zero. For Gods Sake, Net Zero. What a Farce. What a Farce. A Farce. I Demand a Royal Commission into Net Zero , Renewables, Australian Government, IPCs that I’ve seen and Can’t believe are allowed. Stop this Nonsense Immediately, or you what ? You have NO idea what you are doing to a Dry Continent. None. You Threaten the Future here now and into when ? Ban Solar Farms because They Are a Climate Impact and I watch it from My region, mine. You have Never even Noticed Heat arising from Solar Farms, have you ? What does it do ? Tell me. What does Heat Do ? Do ? What does it Do ? I Demand a Royal Commission for my own reasons I Must Save the Original Native Species we Share a Dry Continent with, our government threaten, Always Have, Always Will. I therefore Vehemently Object to Glenellen Solar Farm, and I do, and I know why, I do. Key Issues missed on the Submission form, you fools as our government, Unaware: Impact to Climate. Tick Tick. Impact to Catchments. Tick Tick. Impacts to Subsurface Catchments. Tick Tick. And Also these you missed, gov.au, IPC unaware: Impacts to NSW Impacts to Australian Food Bowl. Impacts to Soil Impacts to Microbiota Impacts to 8th Generational Future Impacts to Sacred Land Murray River Lands Impacts to Sacred Catchments Impacts to Sacred region Jindera, Jindera, and a very Sacred area it is. I'm not a Robot. Robots don't Feel. How Dare You, gov.au, think we are, when you are, because you Cannot feel Grief.

jinderatomurrayriversacredlanddoc.pdf (PDF, 92.64 KB)

Save Our Surroundings (SOS)

New South Wales

23/11/2023

Object

Website

Further to our verbal submission at the 16/11/23 public meeting we herein provide a more detailed written submission of our objections to the proposed Glenellen Solar Works. Our written submission and our SOS research paper "Wind and Solar Electricity Generation Are the Answer. Seriously? November 2022" are attachments. Our submission concludes that: Save our Surroundings (SOS) only highlighted a few issues in this submission. We hope the Commission will critically assess the significant deficiencies we have raised with the Glenellen Solar proposal and DPE Assessment Report. The upfront and repeated creation of substantial greenhouse gases, the driving up of NEM system electricity costs because of a very low-capacity factor, declining efficiency and short lives and are but two matters raised. Our attachment expands on these and many other issues. Also, the project will not meet the secondary objectives of being clean, reliable, secure and a substantial local regional job creator. We disagree with the DPE's conclusion that the project is in the "...public interest and approvable". Based on the analysis and evidence provided in this submission we trust that the Commission will reach the same conclusion as has SOS. Your sincerely Save Our Surroundings 

sos-research-paper-november-2022pdf.pdf (PDF, 4.56 MB)

sos-sbm-to-ipcn-on-glenellen-sw-231123-v3pdf.pdf (PDF, 1.93 MB)

New South Wales

23/11/2023

Object

Website

I can I’ll afford the time currently to make a diligent submission, currently there is rain coming and you need to appreciate that rain at this time of year downgrades our crops costing us a large drop in income. As previously mentioned in earlier correspondence this is a horrendous time of the year to have this dumped in our laps. If the commission can be generous enough to offer an extension I would be able to do a worthwhile submission once this pending rain has brought our harvesting to a standstill. We need the opportunity to be given appropriate time to collect our data and our thoughts. Thanking you in advance Jim Parrett

New South Wales

23/11/2023

Object

Website

I am objecting to this project, I am part of a 5th generation family farming enterprise that adjoins the proposed project which comprises of 800ha of farming land that adjoins the proposed project that comprises of grain and livestock production, my concerns relating to running a viable agribusiness in close proximity to the the proposed project are as follows: • Public liability insurance, our current insurer will only cover a maximum amount of $50 million and will not cover us for farming next to a project of this value which could have a serious impact on our business, I would like to propose to the IPCN that the developer of this project must legally cover ours and adjoining farming operations public liability insurance for this project to go ahead. • Visual impact, looking at the project plan there is very little vegetation screen on the north and north easter side of the project, this side of the project will have a predominate impact on us as our property adjoins this side of the project, I would like to see at least 50 meters of vegetation screen to mitigate the visual impact on us which would also help mitigate the photovoltaic heat island effect. • Photovoltaic heat island effect, as mentioned above. • Removal of some 150 large paddock trees, it is very concerning to see a project such as this that has the label of “renewable energy” and “green” requires the removal of this many large trees that would be all doing their part at keeping the water table down, I would like to propose that the project work around the paddock trees and keep as many as possible, paddock trees are not convenient from a cropping point of view for us but we have to work around them and are happy to do so. • Is there a weed and pest management plan for noxious weeds and pests? • What fire plans are in place for the project in the event of a bushfire a can not see they have been made public? • Will the fencing of the project be livestock proof? Is there any specifications available?

New South Wales

22/11/2023

Object

Website

I strongly object to the proposed Glenellan Solar. I acknowledge the importance of renewable energy but I do not believe this is the place for them. The visual and environmental impacts caused by the solar panels will not be in keeping with the area. As a neighbour I am concerned for the - Visual and environmental impacts - Inability of appropriate affordable insurance and liability cover. - The quantity of trees having to be removed. - My understanding that local firefighters are unable to enter solar properties. - Decommissioning, monies available and they don’t become landfill.

22/11/2023

Object

Website

This project will destroy agricultural land. This project will turn the landscape from rural to industrial. This project will destroy rural communities. This project will destroy local economy. This project will risk toxic run-off into the Hume Dam. Components of this project are not recyclable This project will have significant dangers when there is a fire. This project will increase traffic on local roads This project - and on-going maintenance will bring biosecurity risks.

New South Wales

21/11/2023

Object

Website

I strongly object to any solar plants being erected on pristine agricultural farming land.

Queensland

20/11/2023

Object

Website

I strongly object to this project being approved because of the loss of prime food producing land. This area has already three other projects in various stages. This land is classed in the top 1% of the best food producing land in NSW. Once it has been lost to food production it is very unlikely to ever be able to be used again. Do you know where your food comes from? When will the powers to be wake up and protect our ability to feed ourselves. We have been fighting the Smoky Creek solar plant for five years and it was just approved by a delegate of the minister on the 28th September. This is prime food producing land in the Callide Valley, Central Queensland. Most of the studies for the documentation to get this project across the line were desk top. It was full of misinformation and we could not get the Environment minister or a delegate to come look at the site before approval. If they did they could easily see it is an inappropriate site for this type of development. Just as this one is. This is another example of the blind rush into an alternate energy generation with no regard or thought for the environment, biodiversity and the ongoing ability for Australian Farmers to produce clean safe food for you and other members of the public. If this proceeds you are putting a very large industrial facility in the middle of a food producing area and increasing the risk of fire and therefore endangering the local community. It has been clear with the Smoky Creek project that no-one involved in the approval process will be here to deal with all the problems that will occur. Tanya Plibersek or her delegate will not be around to fight the toxic fire or prevent the erosion caused be all the hard surfaces on the very fragile soils. The fragmentation of the flora and fauna habitats. This will be the case at Glenellen. Are you going to be present to help the neighbours when disaster strikes? I guess not. The decision makers are all insulated from the impacts these developments cause. You need to put our shoes on before you again make a blind decision on this project. Regards A Food Producer.

New South Wales

19/11/2023

Object

Website

I bring my experience and perspective as both a directly neighbouring landholder and as an Agronomist with over 18 years’ experience in the Jindera District, Hume Shire and the Eastern Riverina. I have specific concerns about whether this proposal is appropriate land use for the area or if the decision is really just being made due to convenience for NSW Government and Trina - with the site being adjacent to other solar farms and transmission infrastructure! I also have concerns for the bushfire risk management of the property and its surroundings. Further than just the Bushfire Management policy discussed in the application, the IPC should seek specific advice from NSW Emergency Management and NSW Rural Fire to clarify community questions and alleviate concerns about the following specific questions - what procedures and training do NSW Fire and Emergency Service have in direct management of solar farm fires? Are aerial firefighting appliances able to work safely within the perimeter of the project to undertake firebombing - if so, what is the risk of toxic smokes in such event? If not fire bombing, how are solar farm fires controlled? Is there truth to media reporting that firefighters have been advised not to enter solar farm fires? How would the various assets/properties in the local area be triaged - in the immediate area there is the solar farm and state infrastructure (as well as other solar farms), agricultural properties, private residences, community facilities. I also highlight the fact that policy and legislature have not progressed far enough in NSW in the areas of Renewable Energy Agriculture Management to justify the advance of this project. The DPE themselves have just released draft Energy Policy Guidelines in the last week https://www.planning.nsw.gov.au/policy-and-legislation/renewable-energy/energy-policy-framework These Guidelines are working towards giving both landholders and neighbouring landholders more clarity for negotiating neighbour agreements, decommissioning sureties and other relevant issues to the Glenellen stakeholder concerns. Approving this project now with knowledge that these guidelines would not be retrospective is unethical! Further to this, the Government has not yet acted on the recommendations from the AEIC Annual Report of 2022 sufficiently - most particularly Recommendations 22 and 23 (Public Liability in Neighbour Agreements) and Recommendation 2 (Review RU1 land use to ensure protection of agriculture) I question the categorisation of the land itself – specifically, whether ONE report is sufficient to make the critical decision between whether this land is Class 3 or 4. Prior to the independent report by Tucker Environmental as part of the Submissions Response, parts of the land parcel impacted by this project were categorised as Class 3 (meaning they should be avoided for such use). After the report, they were recategorized as Class Four. This difference is CRITICAL and I ask if ONE report is really sufficient considering the impact of such a change? My lived experience of this land, as both a farmer and experienced Agronomist, confirms a Class Three categorisation. Over the past 20 years I have personally witnessed the land on the proposed site successfully (and repeatedly) cultivate field crops of canola, wheat, forage sorghum, oats and lucerne – all without evidence of ANY “moderate to severe limitations” as suggested would be experienced if it were Class 4! The applicant and Trina have both spoken during public submissions and in their own meeting with the panel and stated that they intend to justify the farm as agri-solar by growing crops between rows (hence the 5m height, to allow harvesters through), if this is the case, how can the land be considered Class 4 as it would not be able to sustain such crop growth in optimum conditions let alone with the reduced capacity from soil interference and other impacts of the panels on land capability during construction and operation phases? I ask that the panel seek further advice on the land classing to support this critical recategorization. If the land is deemed unsuitable for crop growth, then the height of the panels should be reduced as they will not need to get headers underneath! Furthermore, the fact that, in a strict reading, RU1 land use for this project in the Hume Shire is in fact prohibited use is a cause for inquiry. I question whether such development should be approved considering the NSW Agricultural Commissioners Recommendation to review RU1 use to prioritise agriculture. The use of agricultural land has been questioned throughout all stages of this development and I do understand that the proposal is for an agri-farm balance with grazing still being viable. However, this does not address my key concern; that RU1 land has greater potential than government projects and legislation are currently acknowledging or protecting. With the NSW Agricultural Commissioner raising their own concerns for protection of RU1 land in renewable energy rushes, and calling for a review – which the government itself has supported, I ask if a clause in the Infrastructure Planning Policy is appropriate justification to overrule the prohibited use of this land at this time? The location of this parcel of land and its directly neighbouring land zonings needs greater consideration. I question whether the approval should consider the affected area as strictly RU1 or if consideration should be given to the land zonings in the direct vicinity. Further to my concerns for the protection of the land on which the project itself is located, I also raise my concern for the land that surrounds the project. Yes, the solar farm will be on rural land but is it appropriate to develop the land so industrially when it directly adjoins R2 land and is within 500m-1km of a golf course and cemetery? There is a housing estate 1km down the road – in which many landholders built and bought in years just prior to knowledge of this proposal! It is easy for landscape architects to visit households and say “low visual impact” as they stand in one place on each property but is this really a representation of the collective impact on individuals as they move through their own properties and their local neighbourhood? I ask for higher consideration of the neighbouring land zones in which this parcel of land is located. Further to these concerns, I also support concerns raised in other objections regarding the need for neighbour agreements to cover public liability concerns, the call for decommissioning surety payments, the desperate need for better and equitable screening along Drumwood Road (equal to what is offered to the applicant landholder in their area of the Landscape Plan at least), biodiversity concerns, road use of Drumwood Road, dust mitigation, a slavery free supply chain to sure the commitment of NSW Government to their development of an Anti Slavery Commissioner and conditions to ensure all waste is properly managed through recycling (not allowing these panels to go to landfill - such legislation exists in Victoria and through the EU.)

New South Wales

19/11/2023

Object

Website

I strongly object the proposed Glenellan Solar plant. It will ruin the beautiful nature of our neighbourhood. It is in close proximity of housing and the township of Jindera I would rather see solar panels on every rooftop. Thank you ◼◼◼

New South Wales

19/11/2023

Object

Website

Not needed - there is no climate emergency - see attachment.

clauser-on-clouds-and-urgencydocx.pdf (PDF, 834.77 KB)

New South Wales

16/11/2023

Object

Website

I am writing to convey significant concerns with the proposed Glenellen Solar Farm development and specifically the critical gaps that exist in the proposed conditions. Elements that require further analysis and improved mitigation strategies are as follows: 1. Neighbour Agreements – These are detailed as a significant mitigation strategy against a range of issues, however there is no acknowledgement that associated negotiations have completely broken down, with only 2 agreements in place. Terms have not been agreed, negotiations have not been conducted in good faith, requests for information from the developer have gone unanswered and there has been a failure to address landholders concerns as part of this process. This must be addressed prior to any final approvals being granted. The applicant recently confirmed in their letter of 11 October 2023 that no further negotiation will be entered into in this regard. This is not an acceptable position and I seek the IPC’s intervention to ensure that further obligation is placed upon the applicant to resolve this impasse. It is critical that further work must be undertaken to negotiate in good faith and finalise these agreements prior to any approvals being granted. This has a direct correlation with the public liability element detailed below, which must be legally addressed through contractual means in formalized agreements. 2. Public Liability & Provision of Indemnity – This is a grave concern that impacts all surrounding landowners and has a direct association with the above-mentioned Neighbour Agreements. This issue is referenced in recommendations 22 and 23 of the Agricultural Commissioners Report 2022 (focused on improvements to the policy framework to manage growth in renewable energy developments in agricultural areas), which clearly articulates the need for renewable energy developers to cover such costs incurred by neighbouring properties or provide associated indemnity. This oversight has the potential to financially ruin surrounding landowners through no fault of their own and is a non-negotiable condition that must be resolved. The developers must be held liable to meet the associated public liability costs, or alternatively indemnify surrounding landowners accordingly. This issue has been raised with the developers on a number of occasions and there has been a failure to provide any meaningful response or commitment. 3. Decommissioning Provisions – Whilst there are references made to the required decommissioning processes, there is no tangible legislative instrument that will hold the developers to account in undertaking these future works to a reasonable standard. The NSW Farmers Association have recently called for a moratorium on any further solar farm approvals until such time a reasonable policy landscape is finalised that would ensure the sustainable decommissioning of these facilities. I seek the IPC’s consideration in ensuring appropriate conditions are put in place to manage future decommissioning requirements. 4. Categorisation of Land – As per the Agricultural Commissioners Report 2022 recommendation 2, the Department of Planning and Environment is currently undertaking work in collaboration with the Department of Primary Industries to review rural land zone categorisations to ensure they can be used to prioritise agricultural land use. Further investigation and consideration must be made in line with the outcomes of this review to ensure decisions are being made based on the most current information and data. Furthermore and critically, I note that the initial application for this development detailed that a large portion of the proposed development site was categorised as category 3 land – which is accepted as not being suitable for solar developments of this nature. However, in the updated submission this has been recategorised as category 4, based on a single report commissioned on behalf of the applicant. Given this amendment makes such a considerable difference to potential outcomes, I request the IPC mandate further exploration of this issue and seek independent review of the associated categorisation. 5. Failure to Mitigate Aesthetic Impacts – The key mitigation identified to address the significant feedback regarding the aesthetic impact this development will have on the existing landscape character is around buffer planting (visual screening). There is a lack of detail in the proposed conditions to ensure that the developers are held to account to continually uphold and maintain this mitigation. Recent inspection of the nearby approved Jindera Solar Farm demonstrates the ineffectiveness of this proposed mitigation if not implemented with efficacy. I request that the IPC consider further conditions to ensure this occurs. I furthermore reference the Landscape Plan at Appendix 6 of the Recommended Development Consent. This prescribes increased perimeter plantings in the North East section of the development. This is located around the boundary of the homestead of the property owner who has entered into the agreement with the applicant for this development. This is an inequitable approach – given that this homestead is located the furthest distance from the boundary of the solar farm in comparison to other impacted residences. It is therefore appropriate that the additional screen planting proposed in this location, should be extended to the entire boundary of the development and I seek the IPC’s support in ensuring this condition is included. There are clearly fundamental gaps with this proposed development. Additionally, the policy and legislative landscape to effectively manage the sustainable implementation of large-scale renewable projects in agricultural footprints is immature and deficient. This will lead to a lack of reasonable protections for surrounding landowners and failure to ensure long term governance is adequately implemented. I implore you to ensure these issues are resolved and managed prior to any approvals being granted.

New South Wales

15/11/2023

Object

Website

Submission in response to the proposed Glenellen Solar Farm We are landowners who live on the corner of ◼◼◼ and ◼◼◼ Road directly across the road from the project site. ISSUES WE WISH TO BE ADDRESSED. PUBLIC LIABILITY INSURANCE If this Solar Farm project proceeds, neighbouring properties will face increased costs for public liability insurance policies. We have experienced a fire on our land which started on an adjoining property and are aware how quickly this can happen. As landowners we have a liability insurance policy to cover damages on neighbouring properties caused by fire. An insurance policy that would cover the cost of damage to a facility such as the proposed solar farm would be beyond most landowner’s means. Alternatively, if a fire began in the Glenellen Solar Farm it could be catastrophic for all neighbouring properties. Our Questions are: What steps will the NSW Government/ the owner of the property /the applicant take to ensure costs of additional public liability insurance does not fall on the neighbouring landowners because of their proximity to and the fire risk to or from the solar farm? In cases where insurance cannot be obtained by the solar farm applicant should the neighbouring properties be indemnified from damage or risk in relation to public liability cover by the NSW Government/ the owner of the property /the applicant? If toxic smoke is generated from a fire on the solar farm including a battery storage fire what actions would be undertaken to compensate people if they must leave their homes until fires are extinguished which could take several days? ONGOING OPERATIONAL MAINTENANCE Who is responsible for the ongoing recycling of used solar panels and infrastructure if the solar farm or the land change ownership during the life of the solar farm? Since the EIS 2020, advancement in solar panel technology has resulted in 16 000 less panels being needed to produce the same 200 MW of electricity at the Glenellen Solar Farm. If these solar panels had been installed in 2020 these would have been the first redundant panels in just three years. Who would be responsible and how would they dispose of these 16 000 panels today? Would it be the applicant, the current landowner or a new owner. DECOMMISSIONING AND REHABILITATION Who is responsible for the decommissioning, removal, recycling and final disposal of any panels and infrastructure due to technological advancements or the finalisation of the solar farm? Any approval for the Glenellen Solar Farm must include the requirement of an appropriate financial BOND and clearly stipulate who is legally responsible to remove all the infrastructure and to remediate the site. When and if the solar farm is decommissioned, the current owners of the land may no longer own the land or have sufficient finances to remove infrastructure and remediate the land. Depending on the wording of the contract between the current landowner and the Solar farm developer the contract may NOT legally obligate any future owner of the land to be responsible for the decommissioning and remediation of the site. Examples of NO clear and legal defined financial responsibility is evident in the scarring of the environment seen in the numerous abandoned, quarries and mines throughout Australia due to lack of finances set aside at their commencement by the relevant parties for their decommission and remediation. The community nor the government should have to pay to remediate the land the solar farm sits on. A realistic BOND should be lodged with the state government before commencement of the solar farm. CONSTRUCTION CONCERNS: Traffic, Noise, Dust Issues, Glare of the sun off the solar panels. Who will ensure that the following problems are addressed? I suggest a contact number/designated person as a contact for local landowners if any of these issues create problems for the residents. TRANSPORT Who will ensure the vehicles do not travel down Drumwood Rd? Will the residents of this road have any recourse if this becomes a problem. There are many children and adults who use this road daily to catch school buses, attend the Drumwood Road Golf Course or use this road for exercise (walking, riding, horse riding). The report indicates that this road will not be used but when directly asked this question a Trina representative replied, “Mistakes will Happen” This is a safety issue. There is a golf course with many comings and goings. The driveway is at the crest of a hill and can be quite dangerous for traffic. DUST Residents living in Lindner Road and the dirt section of Drumwood Rd presently live with an unacceptable dust level. Regardless of a 40k speed limit and the use of water trucks I find it hard to believe the dust will not become a bigger problem for the residents. NOISE According to the report the noise level exceeds 50 dB(A} in the EPA’s interim Construction Noise Guide. Exceedances of up to 23 dB (L) are predicted. Yet the report states that all noise should be below the high noise criteria of 75dB. These figures are very vague---- exceeds 50 dB(A} plus exceedances of up to 23 dB (L) could take the noise factor higher than 75dB. The report trivialises the impact of high noise levels on local residents by describing it as short term and intermittent. This noise pollution will occur 11 hrs a day for 5 and half days a week for approximately 18 months. These noise levels are based NSW, EPA levels and are formulated on short term noise generation not this extended time frame eg: building a house. During the Victorian government’s railway upgrades people living close to the work in progress were offered alternative accommodation. GLARE OF THE SUN OFF THE SOLAR PANELS. The NSW Environment and Planning Department has recommended conditions requiring Trina to minimise the potential for any glare or reflection from the Solar Farm. How will Trina achieve this? They state that this will improve over time but how will this happen? PUBLIC MISLED ON HEIGHT OF SOLAR ARRAYS. The original developers of the Glenellen Solar Farm produced several glossy brochures that displayed solar panels, less than 2 metres high, in long arrays, fixed to the ground with sheep grazing between them. They also had three in house meeting with us and each time confirmed that the arrays would be fixed to the ground in long rows, as shown in their brochures. Trina, the current applicants, sent us two community newsletters for the Glenellen Solar Farm, both showing long arrays of solar panels permanently fixed to the ground less than 2 metres in height. Their second and final newsletter dated August 2022- 2 YEARS AFTER THE EIS 2020 - showed a photo of people standing amongst the long solar arrays fixed to the ground. The shoulders of these people are higher than the top of the arrays which indicates the top of the panels would be approximately 1.5 metres high. NOT 5 METRES HIGH as currently stated in the State Significant Glenellen Solar Farm report. The Report also states that the panels will be mounted on single axis tracking poles and this has not changed since the EIS 2020. This significant height change has never been discussed with us nor with other local landowners. The height of the panels will be similar to that of a two-storey house, vastly different from the original proposal. The public have not been clearly and openly informed of the Pole System which was briefly first mentioned and imbedded in the EIS of 2020. Trina’s second brochure produced in August 2022 - 2 YEARS AFTER THE EIS 2020 - showed photos of long arrays of solar panels fixed to the ground approximately 1.5 metres high. This was misleading to the public.

15/11/2023

Object

Website

I am submitting this strong objection to oppose the establishment of the proposed solar farm in Glenellen. While I recognise the importance of renewable energy sources for a sustainable future, the potential visual impact and environmental repercussions associated with large-scale solar farms cannot be ignored. The West Mokoan Solar Farm serves as a stark illustration of the visual disharmony introduced by such projects to the landscape. The imposition of extensive arrays of solar panels disrupts the natural aesthetic of the surroundings, metamorphosing the serene beauty of the area into an industrialised panorama. The visual impact and perceived eyesore inflicted by solar farms, exemplified by the West Mokoan Solar Farm, are not only aesthetic concerns but also crucial considerations for the well-being and enjoyment of the community, particularly the neighbouring properties. The adverse effects on the neighbouring properties, including the potential decline in property values and increased insurance obligations, should be thoroughly evaluated in the assessment of this proposal. Moreover, the environmental implications of solar farms extend beyond their operational lifespan. The challenging nature of recycling solar panels poses a serious issue, with these intricate structures often ending up as tricky-to-manage waste. The potential accumulation of non-recyclable, toxic materials raises environmental hazards and contradicts the fundamental principle of sustainability that renewable energy projects aim to uphold. Additionally, the conversion of fertile agricultural land into solar farms represents a critical loss to the local community. The displacement of such land, which could otherwise be utilised for farming and food production, poses a threat to the agricultural sustainability of the region. Balancing the need for renewable energy with the preservation of valuable agricultural resources is imperative, and the proposed solar farm in Glenellen appears to neglect this crucial aspect. My objection is rooted in the belief that the visual impact, environmental consequences, negative impact on neighbouring properties and appropriation of agricultural land associated with the proposed solar farm in Glenellen outweigh the immediate benefits of renewable energy. I implore the relevant authorities to consider alternative technologies that minimise the adverse effects on the community and the environment.

New South Wales

15/11/2023

Object

Website

After extensive consultation with the solar company it has been determined that no practical mitigation practices will reduce the degradation of the visual aspect of the solar farm from our property. Due to this it will have a financial impact of the land we have invested in for its intended future development zone of rural living. Uncertainty of the outcome has put continued stress to our family and neighbours. Working within the agricultural industry it is concerning that some of our most productive drought resistant areas of farm lands are going to be taken out of food production for the future.

15/11/2023

Object

Website

I am writing to express my strong objection to the proposed solar farm in our community, particularly as a farm owner deeply invested in the agricultural landscape. While I understand the importance of renewable energy, the potential impact on our valuable agricultural land is a significant concern. As a farm owner, I am acutely aware of the intricate balance required to sustain our agricultural community. The prospect of more and more solar farms appearing in our vicinity raises fears of a landscape transformed, with vast arrays of solar panels taking up the very land crucial for our agricultural activities. Our community thrives on the productive use of agricultural land, and the potential conversion of these lands into solar farms poses a direct threat to our farming practices. The fear of losing valuable acreage to solar developments is not only a personal concern but also one that resonates with fellow farmers who share similar worries about the future of our agricultural community. I implore the relevant authorities to carefully consider the long-term implications of allowing solar farms in our agricultural landscape. While I acknowledge the need for renewable energy, it is crucial to strike a balance that preserves the character of our community and protects the very essence of our livelihoods.

New South Wales

14/11/2023

Object

Website

I’m against the proposed Glenellen Solar plant, as it’s in close proximity to my property. I would rather see solar panels on every rooftop instead. Thanks

Victoria

14/11/2023

Object

Website

This project requires considerable further assessment prior to approvals being provided to progress. The number of critical outstanding issues is unacceptable on a number of fronts. Local landowners have not been able to seek assurances from the developer in relation to public liability and indemnity issues – calls for commitments have gone unanswered. This is a critical requirement that has the potential to destroy the financial viability of surrounding land holders – Many of which have been farming their land for generations. The project documentation makes frequent reference to Neighbour Agreements being negotiated and in place, but the reality is this process has broken down and the majority remain incomplete and not endorsed – this is clearly not an effective mitigation to previously raised concerns. Furthermore, there are limited controls placed around enforcing decommissioning responsibilities. I refer to the recent NSW Farmers Association recommendation for a moratorium to be placed on any further approvals of solar farms in NSW until such time effective regulatory controls are in place. They specifically commented ‘Current planning and approval provisions for large scale solar energy facilities do not take in to account the long-term interests of agricultural land, rural communities and the rural landscape following the decommissioning of the facility’. This supports broader warnings recently provided from the Australian Energy Infrastructure Commissioner, Andrew Dyer, that landowners may ultimately be lumbered with responsibility for cleaning up renewable power projects at the end of their lives. This is clearly not an acceptable position and must be addressed prior to any approvals being provided. It is clear that there are limited policy and legislative controls in place to manage large scale solar projects of this nature. This poses significant risk to the future sustainability of this industry and those directly impacted by such projects. These issues need immediate attention prior to any approvals being put in place.

14/11/2023

Object

Website

The Glenellen Solar Farm development requires significant further assessment and the identification and implementation of improved controls prior to any approvals being granted. Consultation and engagement with local land holders has stalled and the neighbour agreements referenced as a significant mitigation strategy are in the most part, not in place. This must be resolved prior to any further progression of this project. The public liability risks and the failure of the developer to address real and tangible concerns of surrounding land owners is unacceptable. Generations of local farming families have the potential to be financially ruined if this issue is not resolved. The location of this development, within meters of not only existing agricultural plots and the most historic homestead in the district but also significant community infrastructure including the local cemetery, the new Pomegranate Housing Estate and the local golf course does not lend itself to the intended use and will result in significant impacts to the aesthetic appeal of the semi-rural landscape. Mitigation strategies for this element have not been well thought through and current conditions limit accountability of the developers to maintain proposed screen plantings etc. The recent recommendation of The NSW Farmers Association calling for a moratorium on any further solar farm approvals until such time an appropriate decommissioning policy is established must be considered prior to this development being approved. We are in an environment of swift development in the renewables space, and whilst energy sustainability is a significant consideration for our country – we must pause and ensure that we are taking a controlled approach that is supported through robust governance processes, public policy and strong legislative controls – none of which are currently in a mature state. I refer to the NSW Agriculture Commissioner Report 2022 – Renewable energy generation and agriculture in NSW’s rural landscape and economy – growth sectors on a complimentary path. This report details a number of significant issues requiring policy intervention to ensure effective future controls are put in place, including many of the above mentioned elements. I appeal to you to consider these issues and to ensure this development is not approved without the above matters being resolved.

Victoria

14/11/2023

Object

Website

Please find my submission below in PDF format

glenellen-solarpdf.pdf (PDF, 199.62 KB)

New South Wales

13/11/2023

Object

Website

Written submission in uploaded file

the-proposed-glenellan-solar-farm-developmentpdf_redacted.pdf (PDF, 67.67 KB)

New South Wales

13/11/2023

Object

Website

SUBMISSION TO INDEPENDENT PLANNING COMMISION (IPC) IN RESPECT TO SSD-9550 GLENELLEN SOLAR FARM Our names are David and Susan Palmer and we have been residents of Drumwood, Jindera for the past 35 years. We have previously objected most emphatically to this development, however if the IPC do rule in favour, due to the policy of reducing reliance on fossil fuels, I would like them to consider the following points: 1. Public Liability Insurance: Should a lightning strike occur in our property and a fire break out and spread to the solar farm, any public liability insurance that we can obtain would not be sufficient to cover damages. We are requesting that the developer Trina under right this risk as it has the potential to financially ruin our family. 2. Use of Drumwood Road by Solar Project Traffic: We ask that Drumwood Road, beyond Lindner Road, be excluded for use as an access road to the project. The road is currently used for the movement of stock and agricultural vehicles and not suitable for heavy, consistent traffic. 3. Financial Incentive to ensure decommissioning is carried out: Currently there is no associated bond requirement imposed on developer to decommission site and we ask that a legal bond be compulsory to ensure that in 30 years or more that the site will be returned to farm land. 4. Dust Mitigation: We request that dust be controlled and monitored on a regular basis. 5. Point of Contact: Require a point of contact to report any breaches of conditions in a timely matter. It should be noted that this project, over the last five years, has caused great deal of stress and disharmony in the community.

New South Wales

12/11/2023

Object

Website

I strongly object to the proposed Glenellen Solar Farm and will outline my reasons below. Firstly, this whole process has taken many years to reach this point and in all this time, the solar company in question has not come back with some form of fair and reasonable compensation for impacted neighbouring property owners. Furthermore, at this stage we are of the understanding that if a bushfire was to start on our property and enter into the vicinity of the solar panels, we can be sued as we would be deemed negligible. My husband and I have four young children and have worked extremely hard to buy our dream block of land and small farm on ◼◼◼ Road, Jindera. We have always hoped to be able to raise our children with the beautiful space and freedom that acreage in country NSW offers. Our new home has not long been built on our farm and we are all enjoying living out this new life in a space we've worked so hard for. Our home site is 43m higher in elevation than the lowest point of the proposed Glenellen Solar Farm. This means we will have significant visual impact and it would seem that we are high enough to also see the proposed Jindera Solar Farm. We are devastated at the thought that the property we have chosen for its spectacular country views, which we have invested so much time and money in over the last few years and now have built on, could potentially have the view completely compromised by this project. We also have grave concerns for the heat island effect, especially in relation to the cumulative effect of two developments side by side and what the increase in temperature means from an agronomic point of view. My husband is a passionate and leading agronomist in the area and we are very concerned about the effect on local farmers, and also on our own crops and hay produced on our property. We are extremely frustrated and angered that as an affected landholder, we have not once been contacted by the department or the proponents in relation to this project. The only individuals that did contact us were misinformed, incompetent and very unhelpful in all the matters we've raised. We believe this in itself is reason for taking this objection further. It also can not be ignored that the timing of the release of the project was one of the busiest times in the year for agriculture, putting immense pressure on landholders and farmers to find time to even compose a submission. Furthermore, how the NSW Government can not recognise that the proposed area is prime agricultural land and far better used for agriculture, considering it is a food bowl (especially during the last drought) is beyond me. It raises serious concerns and doubts about the people making such decisions when a project like this is proposed, one that will have so many adverse effects on local farmers, families and agriculture. I implore that you listen to the objections to this project and act accordingly, for the sake of families like mine.

New South Wales

09/11/2023

Object

Website

I write this objection to the Glenellen solar farm as part of a 5th generation family farming business adjoining this project if it is approved. My main considerations for objection are as follows: - Public Liability insurance. Our current Public Liability insurance will not cover us farming next to a project of such high value. Our current insurer will only cover $50 million. If this project goes ahead, I put it to the IPCN, that the developer of this project must legally cover the liability insurance for adjoining properties to the project. - Visual impact. It appears, from reviewing the project layout, that there is very limited screening on the north, northeastern side of the project. This will have a visual impact on us, as our property is adjoing the solar projects north east boundary. I put it to the IPCN as a neighbouring property that a wide screening belt be drawn into plans on this side of the project. Recommendations by Sustainable Farms (funded by Australian Government National Landcare Program, an initiative of The Australian National University; partnered with farmers and land managers, Landcare and community groups, and natural resource management agencies) – is for a 30m shelterbelt which has a multifaceted benefit for wind erosion, water table levels, salinity, wildlife, shelter, shade; and is in line with the squirrel glider Local Area Management Plan. NSW Environment, recommendation is 5-7 rows trees. (References listed below). If planted at 30m, these vegetation communities also provide habitat for native fauna, underpin local ecosystem services, contribute to the pollination of plants, soil fertility and nutrient recycling, assist in maintaining local water quality, decreases soil erosion or landslip, and can act as a buffer to flood impacts. Vegetation screening and buffers to be in line with the Jindera Solar project Vegetation Screening. - Has the Biodiversity Management Plan in consultation with BCS been developed yet and is it publicly available? - Removal of paddock trees. I am concerned at the number of trees marked for removal across the project site. By rough count, if 150 old paddock trees are removed, in the future we will run into rising water table issues. I propose 30m shelterbelts and 30m riparian plantings to restore and stabilise waterways, to combat a future rising water table and erosion issue. - Photovoltaic Heat Island Effect- 30m vegetation screening would help mitigate this effect - Bushfire emergency plan – Emergency Plan and bushfire procedures and controls for managing fire hazards; has this been developed and made available to the public? - Inefficient energy. Is the system robust and high enough capacity to handle the volume of energy generated? Does the high voltage interconnecting power line, that will be used to transmit electricity from this project have the capacity to transfer electricity from this project to the grid? With the Walla solar farm coming online there are reports the line is at capacity? Is this project only coming online to tick a green energy agenda?? Can the IPCN please comment on this in its report. Is the solar energy generated able to be converted or compatible with current infrastructure and fed into the grid in its current state? - Stock proof fencing. I am assuming that the fencing will be stock proof, can you please comment on the fencing requirements, and any access points in the event of stray livestock into the project area? - Pest management- is there a pest management plan for weed pests and vertebrate pests? References on shelterbelts https://www.environment.nsw.gov.au/-/media/OEH/Corporate-Site/Documents/Animals-and-plants/Biodiversity/managing-vegetation-with-a-development-control-plan-190623.pdf https://www.sustainablefarms.org.au/wp-content/uploads/2022/09/Shelterbelts-guide.pdf https://www.wirraminna.org.au/wp-content/uploads/2018/08/2018PEG-LAMPComp-rgb-FINAL.pdf

Queensland

09/11/2023

Object

Website

Major proposals that have large scale impacts is a national concern. The large scale affects to change the land use to industrial is entirely different to the regional environment. biodiversity, agriculture and small business matters to Australians who value regional concerns.

Victoria

06/11/2023

Object

Website

The cost of insurance to neighbours have been warned they may face skyrocketing insurance premiums.

Victoria

06/11/2023

Object

Website

There are concerns over insurance premiums for surrounding neighbouring properties of a Solar Farm which will have significant impact on families who have owned farms for generations. Landowners deserve to be protected and the long term interest of regional communities needs to be prioritised as developers do not seem to be acting in the landowner's best interest.

Victoria

06/11/2023

Object

Website

We have family who will be directly impacted by the solar farm. I have significant concerns regarding the public liability insurance and how anyone can afford to pursue a family farming agriculture business with overheads as this. This must be considered.

05/11/2023

Object

Website

I write as a family member of a non associated property and hold considerable concerns for my family’s future financial security considering the ambiguity that currently exists for neighbouring landholders in regards to Public Liability. My family members will be directly impacted by the Glenellen Project and until the NSW Government has adequately acted to ensure that liability protections are in place (as noted by NSW Government in the response to recommendations 22 and 23 of the Agricultural Commissioners Report), the IPC surely can not ethically and prudently approve this development. I also hold considerable concerns regarding the decommissioning processes outlined in the NSW Assessment Report of the farm. This report places great emphasis on decommissioning; again, in our current context there are no actual guarantees that such processes will occur. I support the NSW Farmers Association call for a moratorium on further solar approvals until “bond” type financial guarantees (as exist in the mining sector) are placed upon Solar Developers. Now is not the time for the IPC to be approving more solar development in this region when such uncertainty already has been proven to exist! My final concern is in response to the great emphasis put on neighbour agreements and visual screening. Neighbour agreement consultation processes have stalled in the vicinity of this project - neighbours should be guaranteed that these processes will be followed through and assured before any approval - how will these neighbours get agreements (which are constantly referred to throughout the recommendations in the report) if the IPC approves at this stage? The bird will have already flown from the nest…why would Trina continue to negotiate terms if approval already existed?!

Queensland

05/11/2023

Object

Website

Solar farms make it very difficult for existing agricultural pursuits to continue on neighbouring properties. Skyrocketing insurance costs and overheads will continue to impact farms and the families that have worked them for generations.

Australian Conservation Foundation community Albury Wodonga Region (ACF-AWR)

Victoria

23/11/2023

Support

Website

Please see attached file for written submission.

submissiontothenswipcglenellensolarprojectacfawr20231123acfletterheadpdf_redacted.pdf (PDF, 180.5 KB)

New South Wales

22/11/2023

Support

Website

I write to endorse the Glenellen Agri-solar Farm Project, highlighting its pivotal role in environmental stewardship. This project not only aligns with our collective commitment to renewable energy but also exemplifies an innovative approach to minimize ecological impact and foster biodiversity. The Glenellen Agri-solar Farm, embracing the Agri-solar principle, stands as a beacon for sustainable land use. By reserving over 99% of the total agricultural land, the project ensures the preservation of our fertile soils for traditional farming practices, securing the foundation of our local ecosystem. This conscientious allocation safeguards against habitat disruption, allowing native flora and fauna to thrive in designated areas within the solar farm. Furthermore, the Glenellen Agri-solar Farm's proximity to the Jindera substation demonstrates a forward-thinking strategy to reduce energy transmission losses, minimizing the overall environmental footprint of the project. This meticulous planning reflects a commitment not only to clean energy but also to responsible development that considers the broader environmental context. I implore the Commission to recognize the Glenellen Agri-solar Farm Project as a blueprint for environmentally conscious energy initiatives. Approving this project will not only contribute significantly to our renewable energy goals but also set a standard for sustainable development that balances progress with environmental preservation.

New South Wales

22/11/2023

Support

Website

The proposed Glenellen Solar Farm project is a wonderful opportunity to integrate the production of clean, green energy from the sun and the agricultural practices of sheep farming as well as cropping. This is extremely innovative and is already being done in solar farms overseas. There will be no loss of agricultural land, in fact the level of production from the land will be increased and diversified with the addition of the solar farm. This land will be farming sheep, crops and the sunlight that falls on the land. The term for this integration of production is called Agrisolar. This term will be be heard more and more as Australia transitions away from coal fired power generation and into renewable energy production.This particular piece of land is ideally suited as a solar farm site as it joins the Jindera Electricity Station on 3 sides - you can't get any closer to the substation. This is very beneficial, as it means that the electricity generated from this solar farm has a very minimal distance to travel and will therefore be highly efficient in its production. Just last week the United Nations reported that Australia looks like failing to meet its emissions targets due to not having enough renewable energy infrastructure available for green power generation. More renewable energy projects like the Glenellen Solar Farm are needed to help Australia transition towards a green, renewable energy future. This is a good project which will benefit everyone - we need to embrace change, be proactive and contribute to the solution.

New South Wales

22/11/2023

Support

Website

I am writing to express my strong support for the Glenellen Solar Farm Project, recognizing its potential to bring about significant benefits to our local community and economy. The project promises more than 200 new jobs, providing invaluable opportunities for the residents of our town and region. In addition to job creation, the Glenellen Solar Farm Project will enhance economic benefits for businesses in Jindera, contributing to the overall well-being and growth of our community. Furthermore, by keeping energy costs down, the project becomes a cornerstone for local sustainability and prosperity. I encourage the Commission to consider the substantial local community and economic benefits associated with the Glenellen Solar Farm Project and grant its approval for the betterment of our region.

New South Wales

22/11/2023

Support

Website

I write to advocate for the approval of the Glenellen Agri-solar Farm Project, emphasizing its profound environmental benefits. This visionary project not only aligns with renewable energy goals but also exemplifies a harmonious coexistence of energy generation and environmental conservation. The Glenellen Agri-solar Farm, guided by Agri-solar principles, symbolizes a breakthrough in responsible land use. By occupying less than 1% of total agricultural land, it preserves the vast majority for traditional farming, ensuring the sustainability of our precious resources. The project's thoughtful planning transforms the solar farm area into a thriving habitat, fostering biodiversity and supporting local flora and fauna. Additionally, the proximity of the Glenellen Agri-solar Farm to the Jindera substation showcases strategic positioning, minimizing the ecological footprint associated with energy transmission. This meticulous approach underscores the project's commitment to minimizing environmental impact while meeting our growing energy needs. I urge the Commission to recognize the Glenellen Agri-solar Farm Project as a trailblazer in sustainable development, combining energy innovation with environmental stewardship. Your approval of this project will signify a significant step towards a cleaner, greener future for our community.

New South Wales

22/11/2023

Support

Website

I am writing to express my full support for the Glenellen Solar Farm Project, recognizing its pivotal role in fostering a transition to renewable energy and reducing carbon emissions. The long-term benefits of shifting from coal-powered energy to solar energy are undeniable, aligning with the state's commitment to achieving net-zero carbon emissions. The Glenellen Solar Farm Project is projected to contribute significantly to this goal by reducing carbon emissions by an impressive 328,000 tons of CO2 annually. This impact is crucial for the overall well-being of our environment and the health of future generations. The sooner projects like this are operational will assist with the current cost of living crisis. I urge the Commission to consider the long-term positive effects on our climate and endorse the Glenellen Solar Farm Agri-Solar Project as a beacon of sustainable energy development in our region.

New South Wales

21/11/2023

Support

Website

The Glenellen Solar Farm is a renewable agrisolar development that will provide numerous positive outcomes. This solar development has an excellent potential in so many ways. Harnessing clean energy from the sun. Transition away from coal power and emissions, which many international nations are already fully committed to. Retaining of agricultural land practices through agrisolar design, negating any heat island effect. Sheep production and grazing is continued on the land. Cropping between the panels of pastures, lucerne and other varieties will be done. Site location is excellent as the land encompasses the main Transgrid Substation on all 3 sides. Grid feed in proximity and minimal line loss, makes this renewable energy project highly efficient. Hundreds of jobs and employment opportunities will be created, both during and after construction leading to large benefits to the local economy. Glenellen Solar Farm has committed voluntarily to donate $2.5 million to Hume Shire Council. A fantastic opportunity to have clean free energy from the sun, and coupled with the retaining of agricultural land production. This is a highly efficient project and is the pairing of clean renewable power generation and agriculture.

New South Wales

20/11/2023

Support

Website

I support the Glenellen Solar Farm and renewable energy, I believe this is needed going forward to help transition to a sustainable future and the path the government is pushing this country towards, we need more power one way or another and if the land under the panels can still be used for grazing its a good thing.

New South Wales

20/11/2023

Support

Website

I support the Glenellan solar farm and renewable energy, I believe this is needed going forward to help transition to a sustainable future and the path the government is pushing this country towards, we need more power one way or another and if the land under the panels can still be used for grazing purposes its a good thing.

New South Wales

19/11/2023

Support

Website

I am writing to provide a comprehensive endorsement for the Glenellen Solar Farm Project, emphasizing its multifaceted contributions to environmental sustainability and community well-being. The urgency of transitioning from coal-powered energy to sustainable alternatives cannot be overstated. The Glenellen Solar Farm Project stands as a beacon in this transition, with the potential to significantly reduce carbon emissions by an estimated 328,000 tons of CO2 annually. This substantial impact aligns seamlessly with the state's commitment to achieving net-zero carbon emissions and positions the project as a crucial player in our collective efforts to combat climate change. Our agricultural sector faces unprecedented challenges due to climate change. The Glenellen Solar Farm Project addresses this concern by fostering a long-term improvement in agricultural productivity. The project not only represents a commitment to renewable energy but also contributes to creating an environment conducive to thriving agricultural practices, ensuring the sustenance and prosperity of our vital farming communities. The Agri-solar principle embraced by the Glenellen Solar Farm Project showcases a thoughtful approach to land use. By minimizing the impact on agricultural production and occupying less than 1% of total agricultural land, the project exemplifies the possibility of harmonious coexistence between solar energy generation and traditional farming practices. This approach ensures the responsible and sustainable use of our valuable agricultural land. The positive impact of the Glenellen Solar Farm Project extends beyond environmental and agricultural considerations. With the creation of over 200 new jobs, the project becomes a significant contributor to local employment, offering opportunities for skill development and economic stability. The economic benefits for businesses in Jindera and the potential to keep energy costs down further solidify the project's role as a catalyst for local prosperity. The well-planned nature of the Glenellen Solar Farm Project extends to environmental considerations. The land where solar farms are constructed can serve as a better habitat for local flora and fauna. The project's proximity to the Jindera substation showcases a strategic approach that maximizes both environmental and community benefits. Additionally, the proposed Development Contribution of $2,500,000 to the Greater Hume Council underscores the project's commitment to supporting and enhancing the local community. In conclusion, the Glenellen Solar Farm Project represents a holistic and responsible approach to energy development. Its alignment with renewable energy goals, positive impact on agriculture, sustainable land use practices, local job creation, and environmental considerations make it a model project deserving of your approval.

New South Wales

19/11/2023

Support

Website

My submission is in support of the proposed development of the Glenellen Solar farm. This is a wonderful opportunity to contribute towards the goal of net zero for Australia. This project will provide benefits not only for the environment and the community of Jindera, but if approved by the IPC, will be the 4th solar farm in the Greater Hume Shire - a wonderful achievement! These solar farms will provide many beneficial flow - on advantages for Greater Hume Shire in the form of jobs for the local people, increased trade for the local businesses in Jindera and investment in Greater Hume Shire by the solar companies by the way of Voluntary Planning Agreements with Greater Hume Council. Another huge benefit of Glenellen Solar Farm, is that it will follow the principles of Agri-solar. This means the integration and continuation of farming practices within the solar farm itself. This will be in the form of grazing sheep under the solar panels as well as cropping between the solar panel rows. This means that none of the land will be lost to agricultural production at all - the land will continue to produce food and fibre for Australia as well as green energy from the solar panels.

Lilow Pastoral Company

New South Wales

18/11/2023

Support

Website

Lilow Pastoral Company supports the development application of Glenellen Solar Farm. This development has been well thought out - it will adhere to the principles of Agri-solar, which means that farming activities will still occur within the solar farm when it is operational. These farming activities will be in the form of grazing sheep under the solar panels to maintain the grass growth, and the cropping of lucerne between the panel rows, to supply grazing feed for the sheep as well as provide hay for cattle in the farming business. This also means that there will be no loss of agricultural land being used for agricultural purposes with this development . Agricultural farming will still be taking place as well as farming the sun, while helping to produce clean, green energy for Australians.

18/11/2023

Support

Website

I continue to support the development of this innovative new agribusiness venture in our community with the inclusion of conditions of consent as an extension of existing infrastructure of long standing.

18/11/2023

Support

Website

Were it not for those with a pioneering spirit many of us would not be living in this region and needing to make a decision on a new agrisolar practice in our community. There are strong arguments on both sides of the scales. Are there risks? Yes. Unknowns? Yes. Enough data to make an informed decision?. We are in uncharted waters. May Wisdom accompany those who choose to swim against the tide, and those who tip the scales. Home Solar Investor/Consumer

16/11/2023

Support

Website

I, ◼◼◼ of ◼◼◼ Street Albury Support the approval of this proposed development

16/11/2023

Support

Website

I ◼◼◼ of ◼◼◼ Street Albury NSW 2640 Support the approval of this proposed development

New South Wales

16/11/2023

Support

Website

Hi, I live one paddock over from the proposed solar farm, my back yard you could say. I believe the land use compatibility is ideal for a solar farm. Its close proximity to the substation must reduce the cost of construction and connection to the grid, allowing lower charges to the end users. The best use of the land should be decided by the owners of that land within the regulatory framework for land use. The land may still be used for grazing and cropping and in the future, it will be used for farming the sun for the production of electricity, not just food for people and animals. The production of electricity from solar must reduce the reliance on coal and gas, both much more expensive and carbon producing. These two generation systems must be reduced over time for all our futures. I trust all of the regulatory bodies have fulfilled their roles in protecting all of us from the missteps of global climate change. Thank you for considering my submission.

New South Wales

14/11/2023

Support

Website

I see this project as a forward step in the transition to renewable energy and carbon emissions reduction as it will reduce the need for fossil fuels & coal fired power stations. This project will also be Agrisolar so the land will still be used as agricultural land with sheep grazing underneath the panels, crops or pasture can be sown between the panels. The land is surrounding a major substation on all 3 sides, the ideal place for a project of this type. It will be beneficial to the community in the form of local jobs during construction and after completion.

New South Wales

13/11/2023

Support

Website

I'm writing to say I'm in support for this development to be approved. I understand the objecting neighbours point of views as I was a member of another renewable project close to the Glennelan Solar Farm at Walla Walla. The Walla Walla solar project was approved and the construction is well underway, a fascinating development that muist be seen to be believed. If any objecting parties havn't been around too or spoken with the Walla Walla solar farms two land owners to discuss the planning matters and how the investment to date is supporting the local communities and surrounds I'd highly advise you too. Solar farms have come a long way even since 2019 when Walla Walla was even approved. The impacts that were expected or the negativity towards renewable development has changed and that's because people are getting more educated on these types of developments. If you havn't got all the facts from both sides, you are very likely objecting to the wrong facts. On a planning matter which this is being reviewed and assessed on I have the following points: 1. Land use compatibility: Solar Farms can absolutely co-exist with other forms of land use (ie: google agri-voltaics) as they don't affect the ground as much as people think. 2. Visual Impact: Peoples main concern on 'visual impact' is the glare factor. Solar Panels have an anti-glare/ reflective coating on the glass and are designed to absord light to generate electricity. If they reflect at all it would be no more than 2% of it's glare factor which isn't even comparable to wet dewy grass in winter or a body of water shimmering from the sun in the right direction. Visually solar arrays are no higher than 2.5-3mts off the ground at a full tilt if 'sun tracking structures' are used. This would mean it can be easaily screaned off from neighbours. Also, if you research around the worls about solar farms and solar installations on airport runways or rooftops that's a testimate that the pilots association doesn't believe tey have an adverse impact on the safey of flying/ landing a passenger/ commercial aircraft. 3. Noise: No doubt there will be noise during construction, though this is very little comparison as it's only for the construction period. Noise assessments would no doubt show no- to little noise impacts to neighbours even compared to a highway or farming/ agriculture noise impacts. Ongoing, there would be no to negligable noise impacts. 4. Traffic and transport: No doubt there will be aditional traffic for transportation reasons during the construction stages, though again this can be kept to day light hours obviously whilst others are possibly not at home, outside of school bus hours and is only for a short timeframe of the whole lifecycle. Traffic Impact assessments would no doubt show an impact given it's size but kept to a suitable route during certain hours would be expected of the EPC. Compared to a highway though, neighbours wouldn't know a difference. 5. Loss of Agricultural Land The land isn't being lost from agriculture. Infact in the next drought, this property will have better yielding grass growth and lambing/ sheep rates than a property without a solar farm due to enhanced shading in summer (better ground tempratures and shading for livestock) and also a makeshift canopy in winter therefore protection from frosts. The land is also only as good as how it is farmed and I'm not questioning the currentland owner but if they wanted to let the property go to ruin that's also their decision and then it could be said that the land is 'lost'. These solar farms are still in their infancy stage and will evolve with efficiency over time, but the alternative isn't a great outlook and something that we shouldn't be taking for granted.

New South Wales

10/11/2023

Support

Website

I am happy to see a renewable energy project in our area. The fact that it is agri-solar is a bonus. We need the local jobs to keep our young people working in the region.

Australian Capital Territory

09/11/2023

Support

Website

The Glenellen Solar Farm Project has gone through a rigorous assessment process by the Department of Planning and Environment, and the Proposed Development has clearly demonstrated that the key impacts and concerns raised by surrounding communities can be adequately addressed, managed and mitigated. Its size (installed capacity) means that the Project will be a significant contribution to a cleaner Power System in NSW and the whole Nation. Its location, adjacent to a major existing hub in the high voltage transmission network (Jindera substation), is ideal from a reduction/minimisation of new grid connection infrastructure perspective. For the reasons stated above, I fully support the Proposed Development and its approval by the IPC.

09/11/2023

Support

Website

To meet Australia's greenhouse gas emission targets, reach Net Zero by 2050.

New South Wales

09/11/2023

Support

Website

I support the Glenellen solar farm and renewable energy. More and more fossil fuels are being taken away and Australia's growing population we are in desperate need to get more renewable electricity.

08/11/2023

Support

Website

I'm writing these lines to support the Glenellen Solar Farm Project as it holds several benefits. From a local point of view, these investments bring job opportunities to the area with the added benefit that such brings to the community in the way of local business increasing their revenue. On top of that the project is making a sizable contribution to the Hume Council that will also have a positive impact on the community. From a local agriculture point of view, this solar farm has the peculiarity that it will be an Agri solar farm, this meaning that during the operation of the farm grazing will co-exist with the normal operation of the solar farm, thus reducing the impact that similar projects have on the use of land for agriculture. Lastly from an energy transition point of view, we need these investments to be able to meet the targets set by NSW to achieve net-zero carbon emissions. This has a long term impact on our health and on our planet, as less CO2 will be emitted. Overall, these projects must happen for us to live in a greener world.

New South Wales

30/10/2023

Support

Website

I like the fact that the project will co-exist with continued grazing. Shows some consideration for preserving agricultural lands.

26/10/2023

Support

Website

I am satisfied with the steps taken by owners of this project to minimise harm to the environment. I understand that the project will not erode the ability of the land to be used for grazing - and this is a good thing. Overall, this seems like a very good project with a lot of thought put into it. With more of such developments, we as a country stand a good chance of meeting out emission targets.